<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: International Survey of Library Automation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/279/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/279</link>
	<description>Dave Pattern's blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:19:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ILS indications &#171; Meeting on the ledge</title>
		<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/279/comment-page-1#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>ILS indications &#171; Meeting on the ledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 08:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveyp.com/blog/index.php/archives/279/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>[...] Dave Pattern rightly quotes the paragraph about SirsiDynix. They suffer badly because Horizon customers feel very let-down about the switch to Symphony (similar to Voyager above). Even the Unicorn customers don&#8217;t seem to have much trust in the company. Dave highlights Scribe&#8217;s suggestion that maybe SD are happy to lose a substantial part of their customer base simply because they don&#8217;t have the level of staffing required to migrate and support them. This might be supported by the UK position: the SD UK office aren&#8217;t keen to let Horizon customers move to Horizon 7.4/ HIP 3.09 which are being offered in the US, and we&#8217;ve wondered whether this is because they simply don&#8217;t have the remaining Horizon expertise to support this. The SD argument is that they don&#8217;t want to spend staffing resource on a legacy system, but as many of us will be on that legacy system for some years we&#8217;d rather our money went on something we would use rather than a system we&#8217;re not yet committed to migrating to.Â  SD&#8217;s acceptable customer loss level was talked about amongst the delegates at CODI. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dave Pattern rightly quotes the paragraph about SirsiDynix. They suffer badly because Horizon customers feel very let-down about the switch to Symphony (similar to Voyager above). Even the Unicorn customers don&#039;t seem to have much trust in the company. Dave highlights Scribe&#039;s suggestion that maybe SD are happy to lose a substantial part of their customer base simply because they don&#039;t have the level of staffing required to migrate and support them. This might be supported by the UK position: the SD UK office aren&#039;t keen to let Horizon customers move to Horizon 7.4/ HIP 3.09 which are being offered in the US, and we&#039;ve wondered whether this is because they simply don&#039;t have the remaining Horizon expertise to support this. The SD argument is that they don&#039;t want to spend staffing resource on a legacy system, but as many of us will be on that legacy system for some years we&#039;d rather our money went on something we would use rather than a system we&#039;re not yet committed to migrating to.Â  SD&#039;s acceptable customer loss level was talked about amongst the delegates at CODI. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scribe</title>
		<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/279/comment-page-1#comment-643</link>
		<dc:creator>Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveyp.com/blog/index.php/archives/279/#comment-643</guid>
		<description>Very interesting survey!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting survey!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
