<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calling all Librarians, Calling all Librarians!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/292/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/292</link>
	<description>Dave Pattern's weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Pattern</title>
		<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/292#comment-45335</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Pattern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveyp.com/blog/index.php/archives/292/#comment-45335</guid>
		<description>Many thanks Kathryn &#038; Randal!

I'm beginning to suspect that the painting may have been made specifically for the film.  

In particular, the faces are looking directly at Janet Leigh when she walks into her Lowery's office.  At that point, she's either considering, or has already decided to, steal the $40,000.

From that point on, there are several instances where male characters stare at Leigh and she feels guilt (even though the male characters don't know she has stolen the money) -- Lowery stares at Leigh as he walks in front of her car at the traffic lights, the traffic cop stares at Leigh from behind his dark sunglasses, etc...

&lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0096.jpg" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0107.jpg" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0172.jpg" /&gt;

...and we, the viewer, stare directly at her throughout her journey in the car...

&lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0175.jpg" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0184.jpg" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0189.jpg" /&gt;

...and even after her murder in shower, we continue to stare at her...

&lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0451.jpg" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0453.jpg" /&gt; &lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0455.jpg" /&gt;

Just before the infamous shower scene, Leigh decides to return the money.  It's at this point, when she no longer feels guilty, that Norman Bates stares at her (without her knowledge) through the peephole.

&lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0363.jpg" /&gt;

So, perhaps the figures in the painting are simply there to be the first to stare at the guilty thief?

&lt;img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0073.jpg" /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks Kathryn &#038; Randal!</p>
<p>I&#039;m beginning to suspect that the painting may have been made specifically for the film.  </p>
<p>In particular, the faces are looking directly at Janet Leigh when she walks into her Lowery&#039;s office.  At that point, she&#039;s either considering, or has already decided to, steal the $40,000.</p>
<p>From that point on, there are several instances where male characters stare at Leigh and she feels guilt (even though the male characters don&#039;t know she has stolen the money) &#8212; Lowery stares at Leigh as he walks in front of her car at the traffic lights, the traffic cop stares at Leigh from behind his dark sunglasses, etc&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0096.jpg" /> <img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0107.jpg" /> <img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0172.jpg" /></p>
<p>&#8230;and we, the viewer, stare directly at her throughout her journey in the car&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0175.jpg" /> <img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0184.jpg" /> <img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0189.jpg" /></p>
<p>&#8230;and even after her murder in shower, we continue to stare at her&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0451.jpg" /> <img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0453.jpg" /> <img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0455.jpg" /></p>
<p>Just before the infamous shower scene, Leigh decides to return the money.  It&#039;s at this point, when she no longer feels guilty, that Norman Bates stares at her (without her knowledge) through the peephole.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0363.jpg" /></p>
<p>So, perhaps the figures in the painting are simply there to be the first to stare at the guilty thief?</p>
<p><img src="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/1000/47/thumbnails/0073.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randal Baier</title>
		<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/292#comment-45303</link>
		<dc:creator>randal Baier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 02:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveyp.com/blog/index.php/archives/292/#comment-45303</guid>
		<description>I don't think this is a Picasso, but I admit, one of the faces does look very similar to the Picasso image "TÃªte de femme (Portrait de Mademoiselle Aubrey)" http://picasso.tamu.edu/picasso/ImgViewer?imageURL=./graphics/1941/opp41-028.jpg . Frankly the image looks similar to a Rouault or a Chagall but it's difficult to say. There is a hint of a signature in the lower right corner, but it's very fuzzy. I like the Beckman guess also. In short, we don't know. It could be something from a flea market!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t think this is a Picasso, but I admit, one of the faces does look very similar to the Picasso image &#034;TÃªte de femme (Portrait de Mademoiselle Aubrey)&#034; <a href="http://picasso.tamu.edu/picasso/ImgViewer?imageURL=./graphics/1941/opp41-028.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://picasso.tamu.edu/picasso/ImgViewer?imageURL=./graphics/1941/opp41-028.jpg</a> . Frankly the image looks similar to a Rouault or a Chagall but it&#039;s difficult to say. There is a hint of a signature in the lower right corner, but it&#039;s very fuzzy. I like the Beckman guess also. In short, we don&#039;t know. It could be something from a flea market!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathryn Deiss</title>
		<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/292#comment-42949</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathryn Deiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveyp.com/blog/index.php/archives/292/#comment-42949</guid>
		<description>Hi Davey, I do not believe this is a Picasso. It looks like it could be a George Grosz (1893-1959). See: http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;channel=s&#38;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&#38;hs=fz0&#38;resnum=0&#38;q=george+grosz&#38;um=1&#38;ie=UTF-8
Or perhaps a Max Beckman? See: http://images.google.com/images?um=1&#38;hl=en&#38;client=firefox-a&#38;channel=s&#38;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&#38;hs=040&#38;q=%22max+beckman%22&#38;btnG=Search+Images
Just some ideas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Davey, I do not believe this is a Picasso. It looks like it could be a George Grosz (1893-1959). See: <a href="http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;channel=s&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=fz0&amp;resnum=0&amp;q=george+grosz&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;channel=s&amp;rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&amp;hs=fz0&amp;resnum=0&amp;q=george+grosz&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8</a><br />
Or perhaps a Max Beckman? See: <a href="http://images.google.com/images?um=1&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;channel=s&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;hs=040&amp;q=%22max+beckman%22&amp;btnG=Search+Images" rel="nofollow">http://images.google.com/images?um=1&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;channel=s&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;hs=040&amp;q=%22max+beckman%22&amp;btnG=Search+Images</a><br />
Just some ideas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.daveyp.com/blog/archives/292#comment-42941</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.daveyp.com/blog/index.php/archives/292/#comment-42941</guid>
		<description>Take a look at the Hitchcock wiki:
http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/hitchcock/forums/viewtopic.php?t=747</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the Hitchcock wiki:<br />
<a href="http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/hitchcock/forums/viewtopic.php?t=747" rel="nofollow">http://www.hitchcockwiki.com/hitchcock/forums/viewtopic.php?t=747</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
